Greetings my fiat friends. I trust that paper is keeping you well? None of the hyperinflation promised by the precious metal advocates? No real need for the barbarous relic that is gold? No. That's what I thought.
Normally my inbox is filled with naught but threats from the precious metals cartel as well as cease and desist emails from Ben Bernanke's secretary, asking me politely to refrain from daily notes of praise for the great man. Today I bring you a letter of a more serious nature. Frank Fiatstein writes in questioning, just who is Andrew Maguire? He is certainly not known by myself or my unnamed insider paper advocates as a double agent, but would I tell you if he was?
I would encourage you to share your thoughts in the comment section below, especially if you have any insight into Mr Maguire's shady history...
- Paper Money Shield
- Paper Money Shield
Dear Paper Money Shield,
I
am an investigative journalist looking into the murky world of precious
metals. Your site has been a valuable resource and you are obviously
highly connected in the paper money world.
I
have come across some admittedly circumstantial, but highly compelling,
evidence that a Mr Andrew Maguire is not all that he purports to be,
and it is not favourable to your side. I believe that Mr Maguire is a US
Federal Reserve plant, a double agent spy. Can you confirm or deny
this? It seems to me that manipulation is not just on the goldbug side.
Consider the following facts:
1. Mr
Maguire came out of nowhere only a few years ago, with no previous
involvement in the internet gold community. Google searches reveal
nothing.
2. Mr Maguire is said
to be a former Goldman Sachs trader. We all know GS has planted many
former employees in government positions seeking to influence them to
suit itself.
3. Jeff
Christian, who also worked at GS, could not find anyone in the precious
metals industry who had heard of Mr Maguire and Mr Maguire has failed
to provide a CV listing his employment in rebuttal.
4. Searches
on London newspapers such as the London Times, The Guardian, The Sun,
and The Telegraph, for confirmation of the supposed hit-and-run that
sent Andrew Maguire and his wife to the hospital give no results, which
is strange for such a dramatic event which involved hospitalization, a
head-on at full speed (with the driver hitting 2 other cars as he sped
off), and police helicopters.
5. Mr
Maguire supposedly has deep contacts in the precious metals market, yet
did not inform his readers that a price smash was coming, causing them
to lose a lot of money.
The
lack of a prior history and inability to provide a CV are calling cards
of a fake identity, created quickly. The hit-and-run adds the necessary
drama to get the attention of the silly emotional goldbugs, and is
brilliant psychology which is designed to cast Mr Maguire as a martyr –
how most goldbugs see themselves and thus create a connection between
them and their misinformation agent.
The
last piece of the puzzle came into place for me with Mr Maguire’s
inability to warn of the gold price smash. Clearly his brief is to
engage in Psy Ops
to screw the goldbugs over with illogical theories about how the
precious metals markets work (which don’t accord with reality, creating cognitive dissonance
within the goldbug mind) and then get them to lose money buy just
telling them to hold precious metals forever. Clearly the end objective
is to demoralise goldbugs so they will never buy precious metals again.
The
reference to him working at Goldman is probably the only correct part
of his cover story. It is not coincidental that he led his followers
into the trap of being long while his former employer said, just before
the biggest smash in the gold market (suspicious in itself), that the
gold price would fall and to go short. GS needed silly longs to execute
their short strategy against and Mr Maguire obliged.
Being
a paper money advocate, I doubt you will be prepared to reveal your
paper master’s brilliant double cross of the goldbugs in what I think
will end up being GoldGate. While the advantages of paper money are
clear to me and anyone with half a brain, and the silly goldbugs deserve
to lose their money, I nevertheless am bound to seek the truth. It
seems to me the paper money advocates do not have clean hands in this
matter. I challenge you to publish this email and come clean.
Yours sincerely,
Freddy Fiatstein
